The template for many Internet exposes of the NKJV seems to be Gail’s tract, “New King James Errors & Omissions.” Also, her books, New Age Bible Versions, The Language of the King James Bible, In Awe of Thy Word, as well as her CDs and videos use the same line of reasoning found in the tract which has so effectively persuaded readers to reject the. (See Riplinger's tract on the NKJV.) 3. It is estimated that the NKJV makes over , translation changes, which comes to over eighty changes per page and about three changes per verse! A great number of these changes bring the NKJV in line with the readings of such Alexandrian perversions as the NIV and the RSV. May 18, · The NKJV: A Deadly Translation (Article) Discussion in ' Archive' started by brothersmiller, May 18, Top Posters. That it's a King James Bible (which is a lie), and (2) that it's based on the Textus Receptus (which is only a partial truth). (See Riplinger's tract on the NKJV.) 3. It is estimated that the NKJV makes over.
Riplinger s tract on the nkjv bible
Chick Tract Day 9, KJV Gail Riplinger on Young's Literal Translation, time: 8:58
Tags: Sahih bukhari commentary pdfHazmat headcase steam workshop er, Ennio morricone ninna nanna per adultery adobe , California love zapp and roger, Lexmark 3100 series driver windows 7 In Gail Riplinger’s tract, “ New King James Errors & Omissions,” she claims, “The NKJV ignored the KJV Greek Textus Receptus over 1, times.” This impressive assertion is never documented and careful investigation reveals the opposite to be the case — the NKJV normally follows the Textus Receptus and most of the alleged “errors and omissions” represent accurate translations. The template for many Internet exposes of the NKJV seems to be Gail’s tract, “New King James Errors & Omissions.” Also, her books, New Age Bible Versions, The Language of the King James Bible, In Awe of Thy Word, as well as her CDs and videos use the same line of reasoning found in the tract which has so effectively persuaded readers to reject the. May 18, · The NKJV: A Deadly Translation (Article) Discussion in ' Archive' started by brothersmiller, May 18, Top Posters. That it's a King James Bible (which is a lie), and (2) that it's based on the Textus Receptus (which is only a partial truth). (See Riplinger's tract on the NKJV.) 3. It is estimated that the NKJV makes over. (See Riplinger's tract on the NKJV.) 3. It is estimated that the NKJV makes over , translation changes, which comes to over eighty changes per page and about three changes per verse! A great number of these changes bring the NKJV in line with the readings of such Alexandrian perversions as the NIV and the RSV.
I think, that you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
You are mistaken. Let's discuss it.